States of War
(eBook)

Book Cover
Average Rating
Published
Columbia University Press, 2011.
ISBN
9780231528665
Status
Available Online

Description

Loading Description...

Also in this Series

Checking series information...

More Like This

Loading more titles like this title...

More Details

Format
eBook
Language
English

Reviews from GoodReads

Loading GoodReads Reviews.

Citations

APA Citation, 7th Edition (style guide)

David William Bates., & David William Bates|AUTHOR. (2011). States of War . Columbia University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

David William Bates and David William Bates|AUTHOR. 2011. States of War. Columbia University Press.

Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 17th Edition (style guide)

David William Bates and David William Bates|AUTHOR. States of War Columbia University Press, 2011.

MLA Citation, 9th Edition (style guide)

David William Bates, and David William Bates|AUTHOR. States of War Columbia University Press, 2011.

Note! Citations contain only title, author, edition, publisher, and year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of August 2021.

Staff View

Go To Grouped Work

Grouping Information

Grouped Work IDdb751bd4-3af7-457f-d00a-a40677aa4ba8-eng
Full titlestates of war
Authorbates david william
Grouping Categorybook
Last Update2024-03-20 23:01:07PM
Last Indexed2024-03-29 04:36:11AM

Book Cover Information

Image Sourcehoopla
First LoadedMar 3, 2024
Last UsedMar 3, 2024

Hoopla Extract Information

stdClass Object
(
    [year] => 2011
    [artist] => David William Bates
    [fiction] => 
    [coverImageUrl] => https://cover.hoopladigital.com/csp_9780231528665_270.jpeg
    [titleId] => 11860979
    [isbn] => 9780231528665
    [abridged] => 
    [language] => ENGLISH
    [profanity] => 
    [title] => States of War
    [demo] => 
    [segments] => Array
        (
        )

    [pages] => 272
    [children] => 
    [artists] => Array
        (
            [0] => stdClass Object
                (
                    [name] => David William Bates
                    [relationship] => AUTHOR
                )

        )

    [genres] => Array
        (
            [0] => History & Theory
            [1] => Political Science
        )

    [price] => 3.49
    [id] => 11860979
    [edited] => 
    [kind] => EBOOK
    [active] => 1
    [upc] => 
    [synopsis] => We fear that the growing threat of violent attack, whether from terrorism or other sources, has upset the balance between existential concepts of political power, which emphasize security, and traditional notions of constitutional limits meant to protect civil liberties. We worry that constitutional states cannot, during a time of war, terror, and extreme crisis, maintain legality and preserve civil rights and freedoms. David W. Bates allays these concerns by revisiting the theoretical origins of the modern constitutional state, which, he argues, recognized and made room for tensions among law, war, and the social order. We traditionally associate the Enlightenment with the taming of absolutist sovereign power through the establishment of a legal state based on the rights of individuals. In his critical rereading, Bates shows instead that Enlightenment thinkers conceived of political autonomy in a systematic, theoretical way. Focusing on the nature of foundational violence, war, and existential crises, eighteenth-century thinkers understood law and constitutional order not as a constraint on political power but as the logical implication of that primordial force. Returning to the origin stories that informed the beginnings of political community, Bates reclaims the idea of law, warfare, and the social order as intertwining elements subject to complex historical development. Following an analysis of seminal works by seventeenth-century natural-law theorists, Bates reviews the major canonical thinkers of constitutional theory (Locke, Montesquieu, and Rousseau) from the perspective of existential security and sovereign power. Countering Carl Schmitt's influential notion of the autonomy of the political, Bates demonstrates that Enlightenment thinkers understood the autonomous political sphere as a space of law protecting individuals according to their political status, not as mere members of a historically contingent social order.
    [url] => https://www.hoopladigital.com/title/11860979
    [pa] => 
    [publisher] => Columbia University Press
    [purchaseModel] => INSTANT
)